Audience engaged at a company gathering
Use cases · Where teams deploy Thrive

Different scales.
Same instrument.

Whether you're measuring a 40-person team or a 40,000-person enterprise, the same two indices show you where people have headroom — and where they don't.

By role

One measurement.
Four roles. Four questions.

Each role sees the view that answers their own question — and only that view. Employees never see their Engagement score. Managers never see individual responses. Executives never see names. The architecture is the guarantee.

01 / Executive · CEO · Board

"Where should we focus?"

Actionable insights on what matters most.

See the whole organisation on the diagnostic quadrant and know, at a glance, where the real leverage sits. Which function is carrying risk. Which segment is thriving. Which early signals — attrition, burnout, disengagement — deserve a conversation this quarter, not next year. Decisions you can act on, backed by evidence the board will accept.

  • Org-wide quadrant · Capacity × Engagement
  • Segment analysis · by region, function, tenure
  • Leading indicators · attrition, burnout, safety
  • Board pack · quarterly · one-click export
Sees aggregates + segments
02 / HR & People Function

"What do our people really need — and what's our organisation doing about it?"

A unique, integrated view of people and system.

The only measurement that shows you both sides at once — what your people bring to work (capacity) and what the organisation is doing with it (engagement). Understand where wellbeing is real and where it's performative. Attribute programme impact to the domains that moved. Make the case for investment with the same rigour finance demands.

  • People × organisation in one view
  • Programme impact · domain-level attribution
  • Benchmarks · peer · industry · historical
  • Regulatory ready · ISO 45003 · CSRD-aligned
Sees segments + programme impact
03 / Manager · Team Lead

"How do I help my team thrive?"

A signal you can act on, without surveillance.

A clear read on where your team is strong and where the strain is showing — recovery, trust, clarity, belonging. Team aggregates only, minimum cohort of seven, never an individual's response. Research-grounded prompts you can actually use in the next one-to-one, not a six-month action plan that disappears into a drawer.

  • Team aggregate · min. cohort 7
  • Domain-level signal · what to focus on
  • Conversation prompts · for 1:1s
  • No individual data · ever
Sees team aggregates (≥ 7)
04 / Employee · Individual

"How do I look after myself — at work and beyond?"

A private wellbeing journey. For you, not your boss.

A personal view — "My Wellbeing" — that tracks your Capacity across Energy, Rest, Focus and Calm over time. Small, evidence-based practices target your lowest domain, and you can watch the trend move as you work on it. A journey you own: your responses are never shown to anyone, and your Engagement score is never shown to you.

  • Personal Capacity view · four domains
  • Recommended practices · evidence-based
  • Quarterly trend · your own history
  • Never shared · not with manager, HR, or exec
Sees personal Capacity only
What we've seen

Three companies. Here's what happened.

Think of the Thrive Index like a Garmin for your workforce. First you see where you actually are. Then you get a clear action plan — and a way to watch the trend move.

01 · Where you are

See the baseline.

One short cycle gives every team a Capacity and Engagement reading — the honest baseline most organisations have never actually had.

02 · What to do

Get an action plan.

The index points to the one domain driving the result and what to do about it. Re-measure next cycle, and watch the line move.

Company 01 · Technology

They finally understood their own capacity.

For the first time, this team could see their headroom — not how they felt, but how much they actually had left. Like stepping on a Garmin for the first time: a baseline, the weakest domain to work on, and a number that moved as they did.

Capacity climbed, cycle over cycle.
Company 02 · Professional services

It showed them where to focus.

Leadership thought they knew where the strain was. The index pointed somewhere else entirely — a clear generational gap their managers hadn't been able to see. They focused there, and the gap began to close.

A blind spot, made visible.
Company 03 · Healthcare

It caught the drop early.

A high-performing team looked fine on the engagement survey — and was quietly running out of fuel. The index caught the fall in Recovery a full quarter before anyone would have left, while there was still time to act.

Seen early, while it was still reversible.

Early pilots · illustrative of what the index surfaces, not client results.

From the validation data · n = 5,922

The patterns hold across the data.

The stories above are what the index surfaces in practice. These are the measured relationships behind them — from the four-market validation study, not a single client.

Up to
18.2pts
Managers of managers score higher.
The single largest organisational lever in the data — leadership layers carry measurably more capacity, and the gap reproduces across samples.
Up to
5.2×
More return on engagement, aimed well.
Engagement initiatives return several times more when directed at low-capacity teams than at already-resourced ones — capacity tells you where to spend.
Employee-NPS
52→88%
Retention climbs across the range.
Employee-NPS rises from 52% to 88% across the Thrive range — the higher the capacity, the more people intend to stay.

Source: Thrive at Work four-market validation study (n = 5,922) · White paper, 2026

From the people taking the survey

Employees don't dread it.
That's half the battle.

Why this mattersEvery other measurement tool on the market gets gamed, skipped, or clicked through on autopilot. Response quality collapses and the data becomes noise. These are illustrative of the post-survey comments the format is designed to produce.

"
Honestly? The first survey I've finished in ten years without rolling my eyes. Short, sharp, and it actually asked me things I've thought about.
Software engineerTech · 3 yrs tenure
Illustrative
"
For the first time, I got something back. My own scores, in plain English.
Nurse, ICUHealthcare · 8 yrs tenure
Post-survey
"
The recovery course was four minutes long. I thought it was a gimmick. Two weeks in my sleep is different.
Client leadProf. services · 9 yrs
Academy review
"
I like that it doesn't ask me to rate my manager on a scale of one to ten. It asks things that actually matter.
AnalystFinance · 2 yrs tenure
Exit field
"
You can tell the questions were written by people who've actually worked. No HR-speak, no trick phrasing.
Line supervisorManufacturing · 14 yrs
Focus group
"
I didn't know you could change a habit in four minutes a week. I genuinely didn't. I've been on wellness apps for years that never moved the needle — this one gave me one specific thing to try, and it worked.
Research scientistPharma · 6 yrs tenure
90-day check-in
"
Twelve minutes total. I did it on the tram. And the results arrived the same week, not next quarter.
Customer successTech · 1 yr tenure
Voluntary
Illustrative · the kind of qualitative feedback the format is built to produce Designed for high completion — short, plain-language, anonymous
By sector · 12 calibrations

Built universally.
Calibrated per sector.

The 55 statements are universal. Benchmarks, quadrant weighting and recommended practices are calibrated for each of the twelve sectors below — because depletion in aviation doesn't look the same as depletion in a law firm, and the data says so.

Sector 01

Technology & telecom

High digital adoption, remote-friendly knowledge work. Sprint cadence, on-call rotation, re-org volatility. Trust and Purpose domains move fastest.

Sector 02

Consumer, retail & CPG

Customer-facing, seasonal peak load, high turnover, frontline-remote leadership gaps. Energy and Belonging are the leverage points.

Sector 03

Travel, leisure & hospitality

Experience work at the edge, shift patterns, unsocial hours, emotional labour. Rest and Calm carry the signal; Belonging rises in peak season.

Sector 04

Transportation & logistics

Operations-focused, logistics complexity, safety-critical. Fatigue and cognitive load dominate — Rest and Focus correlate with incident rate.

Sector 05

Industrial & engineering

Manufacturing, project-based, safety-critical physical work. Shift patterns and plant-level variance. Rest and Calm correlate with LTI rate.

Sector 06

Professional services

Billable pressure, cognitive endurance, "always-on" culture. Talent-dependent margins. Recovery and Focus domains carry the signal.

Sector 07

Energy & natural resources

Asset-intensive, safety-critical, regulatory compliance. Remote rotations and 24/7 operations. Calm and Rest are the leading indicators.

Sector 08

Real estate

Transaction-focused, cyclical, client relationship-led. Pipeline pressure and feast-or-famine cadence. Calm and Purpose move the score.

Sector 09

Financial services

Regulated, risk-conscious, compliance-heavy. Market stress cycles and regulatory load. Calm and Growth domains are the leading indicators.

Sector 10

Healthcare & life sciences

Mission-driven, burnout-prone, shift work. Moral injury and pandemic-era attrition. Rest, Calm and Belonging dominate the physiological signal.

Sector 11

Media, entertainment & marketing

Creative, project-based, deadline-driven. Cycle of sprint and slump. Focus and Growth carry the signal; Belonging swings with project teams.

Sector 12

Public, education & social sector

Mission-driven, resource-constrained, stakeholder-diverse. Emotional load high, autonomy low. Purpose, Calm and Trust are the leverage points.

Sub-sector calibrations run beneath each of the twelve — 29 industry groupings in total. Benchmarks refresh quarterly as the dataset grows.

See it on your org

One index.
Every role served.

Share a little about your organisation and we'll walk you through the role views, the benchmarks we hold for your sector, and what a first measurement cycle looks like.

From teams to enterprise
"One instrument, many scales. We use it for a 40-person team and a 40,000-person org — the signal reads the same."
— Thrive deployment notes
Common questions

Putting it to work.

Who uses the Thrive Index?
CHROs, CEOs and CFOs use it to see the capacity behind workforce performance — across technology, healthcare, professional services and more. It runs from 40-person teams to 40,000-person enterprises on one instrument, with sector benchmarks beneath every score.
What does the Thrive Index tell a leader?
It shows where capacity is low before attrition or absence appear, which of the eight domains is driving each result, and how teams compare against their industry. Leaders use it to direct effort where it pays off — in our data, engagement initiatives return up to 5.2 times more when aimed at low-capacity teams.
How is this different from an engagement survey?
An engagement survey measures sentiment. The Thrive Index measures the capacity behind performance — the headroom an engagement survey can't see. It surfaces structural patterns engagement misses; for example, managers of managers score up to 18.2 Thrive points higher than individual contributors, the single largest organisational lever in the data. Read the paradox →